• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

When it comes to application development, server-side rendering has been experiencing a surge in adoption in recent years. One of the main reasons behind this trend is the introduction of server-side rendered pages also known as SSR or Server-Side Rendered pages. In this article, we will perform a cost-benefit analysis of switching to SSRs.

Advantages of SSRs
-------------------

Improved Search Engine Optimization

One of the primary benefits of Server-Side Rendering is the improved SEO ranking it offers. When a website loads, search engines like Google crawl the site to determine its relevance to a search query. With traditional client-side rendering, search engine crawlers find it difficult to index a website as it loads. However, SSRs load the entire webpage content before sending it to the client, making it easier for crawlers to follow and crawl throughout your site.

Faster Page Load Time

Another significant benefit of switching to SSR is the significantly improved page load time that it offers. With traditional client-side rendering, when a user visits your site, their browser has to load the JavaScript framework, dependencies, and code required to render the UI. However, with SSRs, these files are pre-loaded from the server and rendered into HTML before they even reach the client's browser, substantially reducing the time it takes to load the site.

Enhanced Interactive Engagement

Faster page load times can enhance user experience, which is critical in today's fast-paced digital landscape. Few things are more frustrating than waiting for a slow-loading site to become interactive. By using SSR, websites can render dynamic content quickly, which will undoubtedly contribute to a better user experience.

Disadvantages of SSRs
----------------------

Increased Server Costs

One of the primary disadvantages of using Server-Side Rendering is the increased server costs. The added capabilities come with added maintenance and resource costs to operate them. This is because every HTTP request needs to be processed and rendered on the server before sending the result to the client. This load can exacerbate rapidly, especially if the site experiences high traffic, calling for required CPU resources and overhead. However, modern cloud-based services such as AWS and Google Cloud may make these costs an negligible factor.

Complementary Tool Chain

Another con of using SSR is the need for complementary tooling around pre-compiled code output. Although many platforms and tools make support for SSR straightforward, finding support from dependencies and اس اس آر third-party integrations may be difficult. Therefore, using SSR may require significant effort in upgrading and testing these integrations for integration.

Conclusion
----------

Based on the information provided in this article, switching to SSRs can bring improved SEO, faster page load times, and better overall user experience. However, a potentially server cost, challenging compatibility with dependencies, or required complementary tooling all must be weighed. If your website or project caters to a massive audience with the potential for high flux in visitor traffic, implementing Server-Side Rendering may result in markedly improved SEO and positive user experience.